San Francisco Defense Attorney

MICHAEL ROSS (415) 345-1335
Home
Legal Experience
Types of Cases Handled
Client Testimonials
Case Fees
Domestic Violence
Shoplifting and Theft
DUI Cases
DMV Hearings
Felonies
Drug Cases
Misdemeanors
Probation Violations
Infractions
FAQs
What to do if Arrested
Counties Served
Finding a Good Lawyer
Out of State Resources
Site Map
Contact Me
CLIENT TESTIMONIALS
 

I have never used so-called "Client Testimonials," nor would I ever ask any client to make such an endorsement. 

  
Why?  In my professional opinion, it is an unpardonable breach of legal ethics for a lawyer to solicit this type of self-laudatory "testimonial" from a client. 
 
Client testimonials benefit only the lawyer, not the client.  Quite simply, they are exploitive and unprofessional.

 
 
My reasons for these conclusions are two-fold: 
 
1.)  If a lawyer solicits his or her client to post a testimonial, it violates the attorney's duty to place the client's interests above those of the attorney, and it also creates an impermissible conflict of interest.  Furthermore, soliciting a client to post an endorsement creates the danger of exposing attorney-client privileged information and the confidences and secrets of the client.  It is a deplorable practice.  
 
An attorney is in a position of control over a very important part of the client's life.  Any attorney who solicits a client to post an endorsement is taking advantage of the attorney-client relationship for that attorney's own personal benefit.  It creates a real conflict of interest with the client by making the testimonial an implicit conditon of the attorney's best efforts for the client. 
 
What client would want to retain an attorney with the idea that later he or she would be pressed to make a public testimonial on the attorney's behalf?   Would you?
 
2.)  Even more disturbing, it is far too easy for unscrupulous lawyers to post fake endorsements on the Internet and misrepresent them as genuine "Client Testimonials." 
 
Since attorneys must maintain the confidentiality of the client's case, a dishonest lawyer could post phoney "client testimonials," listing only the first name of the client (if indeed the named-client exists at all).  The lawyer could then hide behind the shield of attorney-client privilege if a new client wishes to verify the endorsement.  It is a near-perfect scam, seldom if ever investigated by the State Bar.
 
When you read some of the so-called "testimonials" posted on various attorneys' websites, you may get the uneasy feeling that they are just too good to be true, and you know what that means.
     
If you have been referred to me by another client, that's all the testimonial I need. 
 

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER:   ACCESSING THE INFORMATION ON THIS WEBSITE AND/OR TRANSMITTING ANY CASE INFORMATION WHATSOEVER VIA TELEPHONE, EMAIL, OR BY ANY OTHER MEANS DOES NOT CREATE OR IMPLY ANY ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.  NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP ARISES OR EXISTS UNTIL YOU HAVE ENTERED INTO A FORMAL RETAINER AGREEMENT WITH ATTORNEY MICHAEL ROSS.  NO ATTORNEY CAN GUARANTEE THE OUTCOME IN ANY CRIMINAL CASE.  TO AVOID DAMAGING YOUR CRIMINAL CASE IRREVERSIBLY, YOU MUST CONSULT WITH AN EXPERIENCED CRIMINAL ATTORNEY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.  THIS WEBSITE IS INTENDED ONLY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC.  ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE AND SHOULD NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES BE USED OR RELIED UPON IN THE APPLICATION TO ANY ACTUAL CASE.  ALL INFORMATION WILL BE HELD STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL WHETHER OR NOT YOU RETAIN MICHAEL ROSS AS YOUR ATTORNEY.